ARGUMENTATION 2.0 & CRITICAL THINKING
Have you been debating for quite some time? Do you know the basics but your progress is not as fast as it was in the beginning? Maybe you keep hearing that you need to “analyze more“, “improve your speech organization“ or “work on your strategy“. It’s hard to imagine what those things mean when there is never enough time to explain properly. Let’s make the time for it this summer. If you can’t decide whether you should apply for Argumentation 101 or Argumentation 2.0: – No previous experience with debating – Please attend Argumentation 101 & critical thinking if you have no previous experience with competitive debating. No, discussions with your uncle over the Christmas table nor arguing with teachers at school doesn’t suffice. – Lots of experience with debating – Argumentation 2.0 & critical thinking – Somewhere in between? – up to you! This course is for people with at least some experience with debating. We will focus on advanced argumentation, advanced strategy, rebuttals, and many more concepts designed to help those whose speeches usually get average or slightly above average points.

Sára Provazníková
Session D
Argumentation 101 & Critical thinking
Sára Provazníková
ARGUMENTATION 2.0 & CRITICAL THINKING
Sára Provazníková
Artificial Intelligence and Language
Michal Bida
Climate Crisis: Challenges and Solutions
Beniamin Strzelecki
Cognitive Science
Martina Kavanová
Cultural Psychology
Barbora Kubantová
Drug design and development
Eva Rogelj
Economics of Crime
Barbora Tallová
History
Emma Nabi-Bourgois
Law and Technology
Eliška Andrš
Medicine and science
Veronika Holubová
Moral Philosophy
Mojmír Stehlík
Neuroeconomics
Monika Václavková
Particle Physics
Oliver Matonoha
Science of COVID 19
Amir Shamsubarov
Sociology of Gender and Masculinities
Ecem Nazlı Üçok
Sound, music and science
Sol Johansen
Structured communication
Tomáš Sakal